Florence, in the heart of fifteenth-century Italy, is where Italian Renaissance began. The city-state was an independent republic, a commercial capital, and the third largest city in Europe. The city eventually became the cultural center of Europe and the Renaissance with patronage from its wealthy citizens who supported the artists and the intellectuals. Many historians agree that between the 14th and 17th centuries, a new way of thinking about the world – which centralized man in his universe – replaced an older system of thought, inevitably giving birth to the period we call the Renaissance. The middle ages were almost over and this was the time for a rebirth of literature, art, and culture.
The core philosophy of Italian Renaissance known as Humanism involved their appreciation of physical beauty and the significance of man’s achievements, portrayed in their many idealistic figures. Humanism encouraged the intellectuals of that era to be curious and question everything, to experiment and use observation to solve problems, and to try to understand the laws of nature. Leonardo Da Vinci’s studies of everything from machines to human anatomy are perhaps the most well-known examples of the effects of Humanism. Their power of observation is quite obvious in the idealistic beauty of the figures from that period, in contrast to the background of most of their pieces that simply did not receive the same amount of attention.
Art was abundant during the Italian Renaissance with artists being the true celebrities, yet characteristics like humanist principles and personification tied them all together. For instance, Filippo Brunelleschi, an architect who brought elements of Classical Roman architecture to his buildings, introduced linear perspective to drawings, which later became one of the more notable elements of almost all Renaissance paintings. Many painters in the following decades also began using a technique known as chiaroscuro which allowed them to create an illusion of three-dimensional space on the flat surface that housed their art. By the end of the 15th century, however, Italy had seen one war after another, leading to the inevitable end to the Italian Renaissance.
Pallas and the Centaur, c. 1482
Tempera on canvas, 205 x 147,5 cm
Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence
by Sandro BOTTICELLI
This painting is composed of two relatively big figures that cover most of the image. The figures are vertically oriented, which is also the case for the weapon that the female figure is holding. There is a big rock on the left side behind the two figures that finds its way above their heads. The rock, for the most part, is composed of horizontal lines that complement the figures’ vertical poses. The flow that your eyes follow when looking at this piece starts from the female figure and continues upward along her body till it lands on the rocks. Your look then follows the rocks in the back to reach the figure on the left, and through the semi-circle create by both of the figures’ heads being slightly titled, lands back on the female figure’s body, creating a pleasing circular flow. The background in this piece can only be described as subtle, since it appears as if the artist only wanted to communicate that the scene is happening outdoors. The big rock on the left is an exception and plays an important role in the composition of the two figures.
Most of the forms used in the foreground and especially the ones composing the figures are organic and rather poetic. The female figure’s standing pose looks delicate, with her head slightly tilted and her arm extending gently to her right. The two figures are very different and contrast in nature, though through the use of delicate forms in both they seem connected to each other. Not the same can be said about the background, however. In the background of this piece we notice sharp, geometric forms in the rocks. We also see smaller forms used on the two figures’ bodies to show details of fabric and the like. Finally, despite the scene being rather dark and violent, every single form and flow on the two main figures feels delicate, calm and poetic. I can only describe this painting as a frozen scene of a play in a theater.
When it comes to textures, most of the attention has been given to the foreground. As we get farther toward the back details begin to disappear, up to the point of the horizon having almost faded away. The outfit of the female figure shows quite a lot of detail, such that you can guess the material of the fabric and even distinguish the form of her body underneath. One can even easily feel the roughness of the texture of the ground beneath their feet. With clever use of lines, colors, and hue, the centaur displays realistic textures and appears life-like. The weapon being held by the female figure shows a color very similar to her hair, though lines and forms clearly define its texture as being quite different. Even the rocks in the top left appear wild and violent, mainly through the dramatic lighting applied and the contrasting shadows and highlights. Also, despite the colors of the rocks being abundant in other spots in the painting, nowhere else feels as violent or rough, which seems to be in accordance with the artist’s intentions.
The artist has used a lot of long and curvy lines, like the ones that show the details in the female figure’s head, or form the drop folds and half-lock folds on her outfit. An exception is where parallel vertical lines are seen, an example of which is the weapon dividing the painting to one and three quarters. The other major vertical line is visible in the rocks on the left side, which divides the painting to one thirds and two thirds. The top quarter of the left half of the painting shows many short, horizontal and vertical lines that communicate the sharpness of the rocks. There is a noticeable hint of a fence in the background visualized with vertical lines, which acts as a separator between the ground and the water. The real beauty in my opinion is how the two radically different types of lines in this piece (curvy and delicate, sharp and violent) work together in a pleasant harmony and significantly add to the appeal of this painting.
The color palette used is not very wide, and seems to be composed mostly of brown and green tones. Skin tones do not seem fleshy – or in other words as pink or red as they should be, – though the skin on the female figure is still not the same as the male centaur’s. The sky is a subtle blue color, and except for the brown used to paint the lower body of the centaur, the only other dark color visible is the green used for the drapery around the female figure’s body. We can notice the same green color appearing in the top part of the weapon, as well as being used to decorate the female figure’s outfit with leaves. The only color that pops out as being radically different is the red used to render the strap around the centaur’s torso. A brighter version of that red color can be seen in the female figure’s socks, with a slight more saturated variation appearing in her hair as well as the weapon’s wooden part. Overall, the foreground in this piece shows warmer colors, as opposed to the abundance of colder colors in the background. The colder tone of the background is, in my opinion, accentuating the foreground of the image and also helps separate the two. The only element connecting the foreground and background is the rocks on the left side, which is rendered using a neutral brown tone that is neither warm nor cold.
One can easily notice a lot of contrast in this piece. The dark drapery around the female figure’s waist along with the ground beneath their feet jump out as the darkest areas of the painting. The drapery is wrapping around the lighter values of the female’s body, connecting that brightness to the darkness of the ground, which is in turn distributing the weight such that the ground and the drapery do not feel as heavy as they should. All those elements are framed by a bright yet subtle value seen in the background. On the left side of the painting, we see the rocks, which, despite having a lot of contrast, are the mid-tones to this piece, and show almost the same value as the torso of the centaur. We can deduce that the difference between those two surfaces is mainly visualized using varying forms of highlights, among other things. To summarize, the background and the body of the female figure are the lightest and the ground and drapery the darkest values of the piece, while mid-tones appear in the rocks and the torso of the centaur. The lower body of the centaur has a value between the darkest area and the mid-tones.
The Venus of Urbino, before 1538
Oil on canvas, 119 x 165 cm
Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence
by Tiziano VECELLIO (Titian)
In this painting we see a figure lying almost horizontally in the image, acting as the diameter and dividing the rectangular frame of the painting to two unequal parts. The figure is lying on her back with her eyes appearing to be locked into ours. Her pose is relaxed and gradually takes our eyes down her body to the dog that is calmly sleeping by her feet. The background in this painting, however, is a whole different story. The frame of the image has been vertically cut in half by a dark curtain behind the figure and to the left that separates her from the happenings in the back. We see a figure sitting close to a chest on the ground along with another standing next to her. Your eyes follow the body of the lying figure and eventually find their way to the two figures in the back. From there you continue to look towards the column and the opening in the wall, which leads you outside of this room.
The forms used in the foreground are mostly organic, being composed of curvy shapes like the nude figure’s delicate and poetic form, or the bed that she is lying on and the dog sleeping at her feet, all of which show round, curvy forms. The background has been divided vertically into two parts, and what remains on the right side mostly uses vertical, parallel forms; even the two figures seen on the right are no exception to this. We can see that the forms in the foreground have a lot of detail – and in many cases bigger forms visibly include smaller ones, – whereas details in the background are more sparse. And although most of the elements in the foreground have horizontal shapes, the background utilizes more vertical forms.
One of the main elements that plays a role in accurately rendering textures in this piece is lighting. Delicate lighting on the main figure’s skin shows its softness, and delicate line work on the folds of the sheets she is lying on helps us get a feel of its texture. The artist has not shown an immense interest in defining textures using details; but has rather used color and lighting masterfully to render various materials. You can notice some details on the red fabric of the bed that the figure is lying on, while most details are lost in the bouquet of flowers that she is holding. Also, the textures seen on the walls, ground, and many other objects in the scene appear slightly different, but not as much as they would in real life. Another interesting observation is the single tree seen on the outside far into the background, which is but a dark silhouette yet still feels leafy and organic.
Not a lot of lines are immediately visible in this painting, except for the ones that are used to separate surfaces. In the foreground, the major lines are to show the difference between colors, and some to define the wrinkles on the sheets beneath the figure. There are also curvy lines noticeable that lead to half-lock forms, as well as delicate, curvy lines used to visualize the texture of the figure’s hair and outline her body. The major lines in the background are the ones that show the folds in the outfits of the two figures, as well as the lines rendering the details of the chest on the ground and the decorations hanging from the walls. Overall, the artist does not appear very fond of employing lines, but has used them sufficiently to define shapes, show folds, and give depth to textures and materials. It is also worth noting that the lines visible in the tile-like pattern on the ground are effectively utilized to show one-point perspective.
In this piece mostly warm yet dark colors are sued. That applies to anywhere from skin tones to figures’ clothing, with the only exceptions being the subtle blue in the sky, and where a colder color is used to render the stony material of the wall and the column; everything else in the painting has a warmer tone. We see a dark red color in the outfit of the figure in the back, which is also used in the small part of the bed that is visible, as well as the flowers in the main figure’s hand. The wooden chest placed on the ground in the back is another example of a warm red tone. The dark curtain behind the lying figure is very close to black and aside from dividing the left and right sides of the frame, is separating the foreground and background along the depth of the painting. Skin tones in this piece are quite close to being naturalistic while not too fleshy, except when it comes to the main figure’s cheekbones and lips. There are also different tones of yellow visible in the sleeping dog and the stripes of the decorations on the wall. Colors in this piece are a powerful tool in the artist’s hands to render the differences between various materials and textures, complementing lighting.
What is instantly noticeable when it comes to value is the high contrast between the foreground and background. An imaginary diametral line going roughly from top left to the bottom right of the image is acting as a divider for values. The part below that line – which holds the main figure – has the lightest values, while the part above the line has been separated vertically into two contrasting regions. The top left of the painting is where we have the darkest values, and the top right houses our mid-tones. This big contrast in value separates the foreground and background and in my opinion tells us that a different story is going on in the back. There is another smaller, triangular section on the bottom left of this piece that has very dark values, helping to connect the foreground to the back. We can see how lighting plays an important role in defining values in this painting. Even thought the lightest values are mostly scattered in the foreground, parts of the outfits of the two figures in the back are helping connect the background and foreground through lighter values, and make you wonder about the story in the back. We can also a see a balanced distribution of dark values in the background; for instance in parts of the designs of the wall piece or in the silhouette of the vase by the window.
The Venus of Urbino
Value study
This noblewoman, although born in Florence and raised in a rich family with strong connections to the church and state, was rather different since her childhood. She enjoyed going to the theater and reading poems, leading to her recreational acting on the side. Through the connections that her noble family had established over the years in the city of Florence, she had the chance to meet the artist Sandro Botticelli. During one of her practice plays at a local theater, Botticelli found himself fascinated with her and began work on this portrait of her, only to pass it on to her as a birthday present.
Zaira Nobildonna(Zaira, an Italian female first name, means “dawning”
and is similar sounding to my first name, Zara.
Nobildonna is the Italian translation of noblewoman)
Italian Renaissance Environment
Citations:
- Italian Renaissance | History.com